Evidence in this report demonstrates that very few services and schools have staff with advanced levels of BSL, and that there are wide regional variations. Few Deaf staff are employed, particularly in visiting services, and there are fewer Deaf ToDs than there were 4 years ago. In general, it seems that BSL currently tends to be encouraged as a result of perceived need rather than as a positive bilingual option.
As a background to this, there remain unresolved controversies around the place of BSL within the linguistic spectrum facilitated by pre-school and school services – particularly in early years, and particularly in the light of developments in cochlear implantation.
The practical reality is that there have been few opportunities for staff to receive advanced level training, or to formally assess and monitor development of BSL language. However, this is likely to improve as a result of recent developments in BSL language development assessment and in advanced level training.
Therefore it seems timely to nationally take stock of:
- evidence underpinning the potential place of BSL at pre-school and school stages; and
- resources needed for fully informed linguistic choices.
Related Posts:
- British Sign Language and Linguistic Access Working Group Scoping Study: Linguistic Access to Education for Deaf Pupils and Students in Scotland
- Scoping Study, Part 2 – Deaf pupils and students
- Scoping Study, Part 3 – Professionals: Teachers of Deaf Children ( ToDs)
- Scoping Study, Part 4 – Other professionals: national shortages
- Scoping Study, Part 5 – Further and Higher Education (F&HE)
- Scoping Study, Part 10 – Specific assessment and access issues: Assessment/examinations
- Scoping Study, Part 11 – Other issues
- Scoping Study, Part 12 – The need for a centralised linguistic access resource
- Scoping Study, Part 8 – Regional variations in provision
- BSL Blog 3 – Talking Politics in BSL
- Scoping Study, Part 6 – Qualifications of professionals: School sector issues
- Scoping Study, Part 7: Role definition among professionals
- Scoping Study, Part 13 – Other educational provision
- 1. Do you believe British Sign Language should be granted legal recognition and protection by the Scottish Government?
- The current position
- BSL Blog 5 – Deaf People – Voters AND Citizens
- BSL Blog 2 – ‘Wealthier and Fairer’
- BSL Blog 1 – Deaf Education
- Welcome to BSL:UPTAKE
- About
- Library
- What BSL UPTAKE does for you
- Welcome to BSL UPTAKE
- Scottish Council on Deafness: Report, 2008 (Part 1)
- Scottish Council on Deafness: Report, 2008 (Part 2)
- Scottish Council on Deafness: Report, 2008 (Part 3)
- Scottish Council on Deafness: Report, 2008 (Part 4)
- Scottish Council on Deafness: Report, 2008 (Part 5)
- Scottish Council on Deafness: Report, 2008 (Part 6)
- Scottish Council on Deafness: Report, 2008 (Part 7)
- Scottish Council on Deafness: Report, 2008 (Part 8)
- Scottish Council on Deafness: Report, 2008 (Part 9)
- Scottish Council on Deafness: Report, 2008 (Part 10)
Related posts:
- Scoping Study, Part 12 – The need for a centralised linguistic access resource
- Scoping Study, Part 10 – Specific assessment and access issues: Assessment/examinations
- Scoping Study, Part 11 – Other issues
- Scoping Study, Part 13 – Other educational provision