It would be useful to have more exploration of evidence showing the contrast between arrangements made for linguistic access to primary and lower secondary assessments and those made for SQA examinations in upper secondary.
It is hoped that the SQA will address expressed concerns about the recent piloting of the use of computer generated ‘Avatars’ to sign questions for SQA examinations.
Funding for access/support services for deaf students in further education is currently not based on the actual costs of providing individual packages of quality linguistic access and support services. It is suggested that this be reconsidered, particularly in the light of the encouraging Disabled Students Allowance (DSA) developments within the higher education sector.
The linguistic access strategies used by deaf pupils and students may change over time, and may vary between individual teaching and learning situations. It is therefore suggested that the assessment of strategies is seen as an on-going process, open to change and amendment.
Related Posts:
- British Sign Language and Linguistic Access Working Group Scoping Study: Linguistic Access to Education for Deaf Pupils and Students in Scotland
- Scoping Study, Part 2 – Deaf pupils and students
- Scoping Study, Part 3 – Professionals: Teachers of Deaf Children ( ToDs)
- Scoping Study, Part 4 – Other professionals: national shortages
- Scoping Study, Part 5 – Further and Higher Education (F&HE)
- Scoping Study, Part 9 – BSL-related provision: pre-school and school issues
- Scoping Study, Part 11 – Other issues
- Scoping Study, Part 12 – The need for a centralised linguistic access resource
- Scoping Study, Part 8 – Regional variations in provision
- BSL Blog 3 – Talking Politics in BSL
- Scoping Study, Part 6 – Qualifications of professionals: School sector issues
- Scoping Study, Part 7: Role definition among professionals
- Scoping Study, Part 13 – Other educational provision
- 1. Do you believe British Sign Language should be granted legal recognition and protection by the Scottish Government?
- The current position
- BSL Blog 5 – Deaf People – Voters AND Citizens
- BSL Blog 2 – ‘Wealthier and Fairer’
- BSL Blog 1 – Deaf Education
- Welcome to BSL:UPTAKE
- About
- Library
- What BSL UPTAKE does for you
- Welcome to BSL UPTAKE
- Scottish Council on Deafness: Report, 2008 (Part 1)
- Scottish Council on Deafness: Report, 2008 (Part 2)
- Scottish Council on Deafness: Report, 2008 (Part 3)
- Scottish Council on Deafness: Report, 2008 (Part 4)
- Scottish Council on Deafness: Report, 2008 (Part 5)
- Scottish Council on Deafness: Report, 2008 (Part 6)
- Scottish Council on Deafness: Report, 2008 (Part 7)
- Scottish Council on Deafness: Report, 2008 (Part 8)
- Scottish Council on Deafness: Report, 2008 (Part 9)
- Scottish Council on Deafness: Report, 2008 (Part 10)
Related posts:
- Scoping Study, Part 12 – The need for a centralised linguistic access resource
- Scoping Study, Part 11 – Other issues
- Scoping Study, Part 13 – Other educational provision